Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of in-hospital course for the two groups

From: A randomised controlled trial of six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: report on a pilot and feasibility study

 

Intervention (n = 22)

Control (n = 23)

Abdominal sepsis

  

Radiological drainage (%)

0 (0 %)

0 (0 %)

Other non-operative (%)

0 (0 %)

0 (0 %)

Return to operating theatre (%)

1 (4.5 %)

2 (9 %)

Anastomotic leak

  

Radiological drainage (%)

0 (0 %)

2 (9 %)

Other non-operative (%)

1 (4.5 %)

3 (13 %)

Return to operating theatre (%)

2 (9 %)

1 (4 %)

Cardiac complication

  

Arrhythmia (%)

4 (18 %)

2 (9 %)

Cardiac failure (%)

0 (0 %)

0 (0 %)

Chylothorax

  

Non-operative (%)

1 (4.5 %)

0 (0 %)

Return to operating theatre (%)

2 (9 %)

0 (0 %)

Haemorrhage

  

Blood transfusion (%)

1 (4.5 %)

0 (0 %)

Return to operating theatre (%)

1 (4.5 %)

0 (0 %)

Pneumonia/pleural effusion

  

Intercostal drain placement (%)

3 (13 %)

3 (13 %)

Re-ventilation (%)

2 (9 %)

4 (17 %)

Renal complication (%)

0 (0 %)

0 (0 %)

Surgical site infection

  

Superficial infection (%)

5 (23 %)

2 (8 %)

Deep infection (%)

2 (9 %)

4 (17 %)

Thromboembolic disease

  

Deep venous thrombosis (%)

1 (4.5 %)

0 (0 %)

Pulmonary embolism (%)

0 (0 %)

0 (0 %)

In-hospital mortality (%)

1 (4.5 %)

0 (0 %)