Skip to main content

Table 4 Change in nutritional characteristics from baseline

From: A randomised controlled trial of six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: report on a pilot and feasibility study

 

Six weeks after hospital discharge

Three months after surgery

Six months after surgery

 

Intervention (n = 20)

Control (n = 21)

Intervention (n = 18)

Control (n = 21)

Intervention (n = 16)

Control (n = 21)

Weight (kg)

−3.8 (3.5)

−8.6 (4.7)

−6.3 (5.1)

−9.7 (5.7)

−7.4 (5.2)

−10.9 (7.2)

Weight (%)

−4.6 (3.9)

−9.7 (4.8)

−7.4 (5.7)

−10.9 (6.0)

−8.9 (5.4)

−12.2 (7)

Weight loss experienced from baseline

     

None

1 (5 %)

1 (5 %)

1 (6 %)

1 (5 %)

1 (6 %)

0 (0 %)

<5 %

12 (60 %)

2 (10 %)

8 (44 %)

2 (10 %)

3 (19 %)

3 (14 %)

5% to 10 %

5 (25 %)

8 (38 %)

3 (17 %)

5 (24 %)

4 (25 %)

4 (19 %)

>10 %

2 (10 %)

10 (48 %)

6 (33 %)

13 (62 %)

8 (50 %)

14 (67 %)

Mid arm circumference (cm)

−2.1 (1.4)

−2.8 (1.9)

−2.4 (1.6)

−2.9 (1.7)

−2.6 (1.6)

−3.1 (2.3)

Mid arm circumference (%)

−6.2 (4.0)

−8.4 (5.4)

−6.9 (4.5)

−8.7 (4.9)

−7.6 (4.6)

−9.1 (6.3)

Mid arm muscle circumference (cm)

−2.1 (1.4)

−2.8 (2.1)

−2.4 (1.6)

−2.9 (1.8)

−2.6 (1.5)

−3.1 (2.3)

Mid arm muscle circumference (%)

−6.2 (4.8)

−8.4 (7.1)

−6.9 (5.5)

−8.7 (6.1)

−7.6 (4.9)

−9.1 (7.4)

Triceps skin fold thickness (mm)

−0.7 (2.1)

−1.8 (2.2)

−1.1 (2.3)

−2.3 (2.3)

−1.9 (2.7)

−2.5 (2.7)

Triceps skin fold thickness (%)

−2.7 (11.8)

−8.2 (13.5)

−2.7 (15.7)

−12.0 (14.0)

−8.7 (16.2)

−11.6 (13.6)

Hand grip dynamometry (kg)

−2.5 (4.4)

−4.1 (4.9)

−2.9 (4.6)

−4.1 (4.3)

−1.5 (4.4)

−2.0 (4.1)

Hand grip dynamometry (%)

−6.9 (12.6)

−11.4 (12.7)

−7.8 (14.5)

−11.9 (11.3)

−3.5 (12.7)

−5.2 (10.4)

  1. Values indicated are mean (standard deviation)