From: Projection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study
A priori thematic framework | Agras I | Agras II | Hunninghake I | Hunninghake II | Ederer | Collins | Weintraub |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol factors | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Population and eligibility criteria | X | X | Â | X | X | X | X |
Recruitment methods used | Â | X | X | X | Â | X | Â |
Complexity, burden, attractiveness of protocol | Â | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | X |
Setting factors | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Clinician equipoise | Â | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | Â |
Priority of research and workload | X | Â | Â | X | Â | X | Â |
Research culture and experience | Â | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â |
Variation between practices | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | X | Â |
Changes in the clinical environment | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | X |
Estimation | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Choice and quality of data used | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | X |
Over-optimism | Â | Â | Â | Â | X | X | X |
Planning | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Pilot work | X | Â | X | Â | Â | X | Â |
Feasibility work | X | Â | X | Â | Â | X | Â |
Projections | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Contingency | X | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â |