Skip to main content

Table 3 International guideline assessment of the evidence for substitute opioid therapy in treatment of opioid dependence (assessment of recommendations based on effect reported in literature)

From: Opioid substitution and antagonist therapy trials exclude the common addiction patient: a systematic review and analysis of eligibility criteria

Title of guideline

Evidence provided

Eligibility criteria used across trials (including criteria from trials within meta-analyses used as evidence)

Grading of evidence by guideline panel

Reported net effect of intervention

Recommendation

Guideline provided caution about populations the intervention was assessed in

Cautions

Discussion of opioid substitution treatment use for subpopulations (psychiatric patients, patients on psychotropic medication, patients with concurrent poly-substance use problems)

Clinical practice guideline for management of substance use disorders (SUD) [13] (Methadone and buprenorphine for reduction in illicit opioid use)

[54, 55, 7077]

Inclusion of patients >18 with DSM-IV diagnosis of opioid dependence Exclusion of patients with psychiatric disorders, concurrent substance use disorders, and those being prescribed psychotropic medications

Good

Substantiala

A strong recommendation

No

Note that buprenorphine is preferred to methadone in pregnant women

Yes, methadone was more effective than buprenorphine for patients with concurrent cocaine dependence

Clinical practice guideline for management of substance use disorders (SUD) [13] (Methadone and buprenorphine for patient retention)

[75]

Inclusion of patients >18 with DSM-IV diagnosis of opioid dependence Exclusion of patients with psychiatric disorders, concurrent substance use disorders, and those being prescribed psychotropic medications.

Good

Substantiala

A strong recommendation

No

None

No

Clinical practice guideline for management of substance use disorders (SUD) [13] Naltrexone for reduction in illicit opioid use and treatment retention)

[7880]

Inclusion of patients >18 with DSM-IV diagnosis of opioid dependence Exclusion of patients with psychiatric disorders, concurrent substance use disorders, and those being prescribed psychotropic medications

Poor to fair

Small to moderate

No recommendation for or against the routine provision of the intervention is made. At least fair evidence was found that the intervention can improve health outcomes, but concludes that the balance of benefits and harms is too close to justify a general recommendation.

No

Suggested for use in highly motivated patients

Yes, recommends naltrexone within highly motivated patients

Buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence clinical practice guidelines[14]

[8184]

Inclusion of patients with daily drug injection behavior, ≥18 and a DSM-IV diagnosis of opioid dependence Exclusion of patients prescribed psychotropic medications, and patients with serious physical conditions or concurrent drug/alcohol dependence

Good

Not reported

A strong recommendation

No

A list of contraindications is provided (e.g., pregnancy, allergy, severe liver dysfunction, acute severe respiratory illness. No mention of psychiatric illness or concurrent substance use problems.

Yes, require no concurrent substance use problems prior to buprenorphine induction as well as required full management of psychiatric symptoms

Methadone maintenance treatment program standards and clinical guidelines [12]

[76, 8589]

Inclusion of patients ≥18 with DSM-IV diagnosis of opioid dependence 18 and 50 years, history of intravenous opioid dependence, no chronic medical illnesses, absence of a major mental illness, a negative pregnancy test for women, and at least 3 months since the patient’s last treatment at the clinic

Not graded

Not reported

There are guideline suggestions provided but no “rank” of recommendation

No

Note about treatment pregnant women and patients under 18

No

Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence [52]

[82]

Inclusion of patients ≥18 with DSM-IV diagnosis of opioid dependence Exclusion of patients with psychiatric disorders, comorbid substance use, patients on psychotropic medications

Reported as good quality evidence

Not reported

No direct recommendations made

Yes, discussed the populations the interventions were tested in and explicit detailing of trial design characteristics

None

Yes

Guidelines for the psychosocially assisted pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence [53]

[76, 87, 90, 91]

Inclusion of patients age ≥18 meeting DSM-IV criteria for opioid dependence with six prior treatment episodes at the facility running the randomized trial, or a single prior methadone treatment, and urine screen positive for opioids.

Moderate for substance use behavior and high for treatment retention (for both methadone and buprenorphine)

Small to moderate (for both opioid use and retention)

Strong

Yes, also a guidance is provided for managing specific subpopulations (women, patients with psychiatric comorbidity, patients with chronic pain)

Note agonist therapy is suggested most effective, methadone is preferred to buprenorphine. In pregnant women less safety evidence is available, use methadone in such cases.

Yes

Exclusion of patients with psychiatric or chronic physical comorbidities or being prescribed psychotropic medication, acute medical condition, and pregnant women

  1. Good evidence refers to high-grade evidence (with at least one properly designed randomized trial) directly linked to health outcome
  2. Poor to fair refers to high-grade evidence (with at least one properly designed randomized trial) linked to intermediate outcome or moderate-grade evidence (evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case–control analytic studies, evidence obtained from multiple time series studies; dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments) directly linked to health outcome and/or refers to opinions of respected authorities; descriptive studies and case reports; reports of expert committees of evidence or no linkage of evidence to health outcome
  3. DSM-IV Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  4. aSubstantial refers to a more than a small relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or a large impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level