Skip to main content

Table 2 Screening & recruitment numbers including screening codes (1-15) for those women not randomised, sorted by overall frequency of reporting of codes

From: A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study

Code

Description

Total

Per cent

11

Patient has not undergone a course of pelvic floor training

105

14 %

14

Urge incontinence

92

12 %

13

Other (give details)

86

11 %

15

Patient did not attend clinic

81

11 %

7

Patient does not wish to participate, include reason if offered

59

8 %

1

Symptomatic utero-vaginal prolapse requiring treatment

40

5 %

8

Clinician feels surgery inappropriate

39

5 %

9

Patient does not wish surgery

21

3 %

2

Previous surgery for urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse

9

1 %

3

Urodynamic investigation within the last three days

7

1 %

10

Patient does not consider her family is complete

6

1 %

4

Neurological disease causing urinary incontinence

1

0 %

5

Current involvement in a conflicting research study

0

0 %

6

Unable to give competent informed consent

0

0 %

12

Study not discussed at clinic visit (please give reason)

3

0 %

 

Recruited

222

29 %

 

Total screened

771

100 %

 

Screened women recruited

222/771

29 %

 

Eligible women recruited

222/284

78 %