Table 2 Quality assessment of the qualitative studies, using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool
From: A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
Study | ||
|---|---|---|
Criteria | Mann et al. (2014) [31] | Paramasivan et al. (2011) [32] |
Global quality rating | Strong | Strong |
Clear aims? | ✓ | ✓ |
Qualitative methodology appropriate? | ✓ | ✓ |
Research design appropriate to address aims? | ✓ | ✓ |
Appropriate recruitment strategy? | ✓ | ✓ |
Data collection appropriate? | ✓ | ✓ |
Relationship between researcher and participants considered? | ✗ | ✗ |
Ethic issues into consideration? | ✓ | ✓ |
Data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | ✓ | ✓ |
Clear statement of findings? | ✓ | ✓ |
Valuable research? | ✓ | ✓ |