Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality assessment of the quantitative studies, using the EPHPP quality assessment tool

From: A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials

Study

Study design

Global quality rating

Study design

Protection against selection bias

Control for potential confounders

Blindinga

Reliability and validity of data collection methods

Retention

Bernhard et al. (2012) [27]

Randomised controlled

Strong

Strong

Strong

Strong

Moderate

Moderate

Strong

Kimmick et al. (2005) [14]

Randomised controlled

Moderate

Strong

Moderate

Strong

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Hietanen et al. (2007) [28]

Randomised controlled

Strong

Moderate

Strong

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Strong

Kendall et al. (2012) [30]

Non-randomised controlled

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Yap et al. (2009) [29]

Non-randomised controlled

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Blazeby et al. (2014) [26]

Pre-test/post-test

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Brown et al. (2007) [23]

Pre-test/post-test

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Donovan et al. (2009) [15]

Pre-test/post-test

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Fallowfield et al. (2012) [20]

Pre-test/post-test

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Fallowfield et al. (2014] [25]

Pre-test/post-test

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Fisher et al. (2012) [21]

Pre-test/post-test

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Jenkins et al. (2005) [22]

Pre-test/post-test

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Strong

Moderate

Strong

Jenkins et al. (2013) [24]

Pre-test/post-testb

Moderate

Moderate

Strong

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Kenyon et al. (2005) [16]

Pre-test/post-test

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Wuensch et al. (2011) [33]

Post training questionnaire survey

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

  1. a Blinding refers to outcome assessors only, as due to the nature of the intervention participants could not be blinded
  2. b The Jenkins study also included a randomised study comparing the influence of the duration of audit (12 vs 6 months before and after attendance of the training session) on recruitment success, which was not the focus of this review. Since all recruiters attended the training session (there was no comparison group without training) and outcome measures of interest for this review (patients approached and confidence discussing RCTs) were measured before and after the training was delivered, we categorised this study as uncontrolled pre-test/post-test design in the context of this review