Skip to main content

Table 3 Adjusted mean differences of patient-reported outcomes

From: Development of an attention-touch control for manual cervical distraction: a pilot randomized clinical trial for patients with neck pain

Outcome variable

Treatment group comparison

Mean differencea

95 % Confidence intervala

Neck Pain VAS (mm)b

High vs. Low

15.6

1.6 to 29.7

 

Medium vs. Low

9.8

−3.7 to 23.3

 

High vs. Medium

5.8

−8.6 to 20.3

Neck Disability Indexb

High vs. Low

2.7

−0.1 to 5.6

 

Medium vs. Low

3.0

0.1 to 5.9

 

High vs. Medium

0.2

−2.7 to 3.2

PROMIS –

Pain Interferencec

High vs. Low

3.9

−5.6 to 2.7

 

Medium vs. Low

−1.5

1.0 to 0.1

 

High vs. Medium

5.4

−2.2 to 9.8

PROMIS –

Physical Function

High vs. Low

−0.2

−2.2 to 1.9

 

Medium vs. Low

−1.0

−3.1 to 1.2

 

High vs. Medium

0.3

−1.9 to 2.5

PROMIS - Fatigue

High vs. Low

5.8

1.1 to 10.5

 

Medium vs. Low

3.3

−1.5 to 8.2

 

High vs. Medium

2.5

−2.3 to 7.3

PROMIS –

Sleep Disturbance

High vs. Low

1.3

−0.9 to 3.5

 

Medium vs. Low

−1.4

−3.6 to 0.9

 

High vs. Medium

2.7

0.4 to 5.0

  1. High High force group (51 to 100 Newtons), Low Low force group (0 to 20 Newtons), Medium Medium force group (21 to 50 Newtons), PROMIS Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, VAS Visual Analog Scale
  2. aAdjusted for the baseline value of the respective variable centered at its mean;
  3. bAlso adjusted for traction-force feedback method; cAlso adjusted for baseline neck pain VAS