Skip to main content

Table 5 Statistical analysis methodology (n = 43 unless otherwise stated)

From: A systematic review of the use of an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design

 

Number

Percentage

Analysis groups according to randomised groups

  

 Yes

42

98

 No

1

2

 Unclear

0

0

Analysis adjusting for non-compliance carried out

  

 Yes

8

19

 No

35

81

 Unclear

0

0

Compliance analysis type

  

 As treated groups

3

7

 Intervention completer subset analysis (full compliance)

2

5

 Intervention completer subset analysis (partial and full compliance)

2

5

 Randomisation-based analysis (method unclear)

1

2

 N/A

35

81

Analysis adjusting for clusteringa

  

 Yes

2b

5

 No

41

95

 Unclear

0

0

  1. N/A not available
  2. aAnalyses carried out were mixed-effect models: one with two levels (intervention deliverer and) and one with three (site, intervention deliverer, and participant). bIn one study, the sample size was adjusted to account for clustering by using an intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.02; for the other study the observed ICC of the higher level(s) was reported for the two primary outcomes (retention and engagement) under a two level (therapist and participant) and a 3 level model (site, therapist and participant) as 0.180 and 0.22 and 0.099 and 0.110 respectively