Skip to main content

Table 3 Sample sizes for a controlled intervention study with Composite Referral Completion Indicator (CRCI) as the outcome measure, based on England and Wales population structure a

From: Development of a composite outcome score for a complex intervention - measuring the impact of Community Health Workers

Level of similarity within households in disease risk factors/level of similarly within households in level of compliance of uptake of interventions

Intervention percentage effect

Mean (SD) CRCI in control arm

Mean (SD) CRCI in CHW arm

Sample size number of households per arm based on comparison of mean CRCIs, allowing for inclusion of householdsbwithout valid CRCI:

Without clustering of intervention by region

With clustering of intervention by regions of 100 households, Intra-CHW ICC = 0.01

With clustering of intervention by regions of 100 households, Intra-CHW ICC = 0.02

With clustering of intervention by regions of 100 households, Intra-CHW ICC = 0.05

Typical distribution across England and Wales: none/none

10%

0.56 (0.36)

0.61 (0.36)

1,650

3,280

4,920

9,820

none/none

20%

0.56 (0.36)

0.65 (0.35)

400

800

1,190

2,380

none/none

30%

0.56 (0.36)

0.69 (0.34)

170

340

510

1,010

none/high

10%

0.56 (0.41)

0.61 (0.39)

1,970

3,920

5,870

11,720

none/high

20%

0.56 (0.41)

0.65 (0.38)

490

980

1,460

2,920

none/high

30%

0.56 (0.41)

0.69 (0.36)

210

420

630

1,250

high/none

10%

0.6 (0.37)

0.64 (0.36)

1,990

3,960

5,930

11,840

high/none

20%

0.6 (0.37)

0.68 (0.35)

490

980

1,460

2,920

high/none

30%

0.6 (0.37)

0.72 (0.33)

210

420

630

1,250

high/high

10%

0.6 (0.41)

0.64 (0.39)

2,470

4,920

7,360

14,700

high/high

20%

0.6 (0.41)

0.68 (0.38)

590

1,170

1,760

3,510

high/high

30%

0.6 (0.41)

0.72 (0.36)

250

500

750

1,490

Typical distribution of deprived areas none/none

10%

0.57 (0.36)

0.61 (0.35)

1,650

3,280

4,920

9,820

none/none

20%

0.57 (0.36)

0.66 (0.34)

400

800

1,190

2,380

none/none

30%

0.57 (0.36)

0.7 (0.33)

170

340

510

1,010

none/high

10%

0.57 (0.4)

0.62 (0.39)

1,970

3,920

5,870

11,720

none/high

20%

0.57 (0.4)

0.66 (0.37)

480

960

1,430

2,860

none/high

30%

0.57 (0.4)

0.7 (0.36)

210

420

630

1,250

high/none

10%

0.6 (0.36)

0.64 (0.35)

2,010

4,000

5,990

11,960

high/none

20%

0.6 (0.36)

0.68 (0.34)

480

960

1,430

2,860

high/none

30%

0.6 (0.36)

0.72 (0.33)

210

420

630

1,250

high/high

10%

0.6 (0.4)

0.64 (0.39)

2,400

4,780

7,150

14,280

high/high

20%

0.6 (0.4)

0.68 (0.37)

580

1,150

1,730

3,450

high/high

30%

0.6 (0.4)

0.72 (0.35)

250

500

750

1,490

  1. a(Excluding chlamydia) and based on 90% power at 5% significance level. b88.3% of households have valid CRCI with no intra-household correlation of disease risk factors, and 84.8% of households have valid CRCI based on high intra-household correlation of disease risk factors. Intervention percentage effect is proportion of services (immunisations/screening tests, stop-smoking clinics) that are taken up with CHW intervention, out of those services that would not otherwise be taken up.
  2. Abbreviations: CHW Community Health Worker, ICC intra-class correlation coefficient.