Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Economic evaluation alongside pragmatic randomised trials: developing a standard operating procedure for clinical trials units

  • Rhiannon T Edwards1Email author,
  • Barry Hounsome1,
  • Pat Linck1 and
  • Ian T Russell2
Trials20089:64

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-64

Received: 06 August 2008

Accepted: 17 November 2008

Published: 17 November 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
6 Aug 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Nov 2008 Editorially accepted
17 Nov 2008 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-9-64

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Economics and Policy in Health, Institute of Medical and Social Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
(2)
North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health and Social Care, Institute of Medical and Social Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK

Advertisement