Principle objectives | Research questions | Outcomes |
---|---|---|
Process: To provide an estimate for the number of care homes needed for the main trial | What are the potential recruitment and attrition rates for enrolment of residents? | Â |
Resources: To investigate the acceptability of the proposed measurements to residents and the most appropriate informant | Which type of data collection diaries (care home resident level), designed by the team to capture health and social care resource use, are most acceptable to residents and staff (>75% completed)? And are these diaries valid (contain information that can be used to calculate costs)? | Activities of daily living Number of falls during previous 6 months |
Mortality during previous 6 months | ||
Hospital admissions during previous 6 months including total length of stay; number of admissions; time to first admission | ||
Health-related quality of life | ||
 | Which health-related quality of life measure, the EuroQol (EQ-5D 3 L) [23], ASCOT Social Care-Related Quality of Life (SCRQoL) [24] or the DEMQOL-V4 [25] is more acceptable to residents (greater % of questionnaires completed)? And are resident and proxy reports of HRQoL comparable? |  |
 | Are baseline and outcomes measures outcome rates adequate (achieving >75% complete data for each)? And what resources are required in determining these outcomes? |  |
Management: To assess the adherence to, and sustainability of Stop Delirium! | What are the adherence rates for the various components of the intervention? And what are the facilitators and barriers for sustainability and integration into routine care, after the intervention? | Total number of medications Health related quality of life Health and social care costs as measured by health related quality of life measures and health and social care resource use |
 | What are the costs from the perspective of the service provider (health and social care) associated with delirium and with Stop Delirium? |  |
Scientific: To determine the most appropriate method to capture resource use in this setting and population and costs of delirium and of delivering the intervention | Can a high (>90%) coverage for delirium screening be achieved using the short Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) [26]? And can a high completion rate (>90% complete) be achieved for the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised (DRS-R-98) [27] in those positive for CAM? Is delirium be determined reliably (>90% inter-rater reliability) using these instruments? | Delirium severity: proportion of residents with severe delirium during a one-month period |
Delirium duration (days positive for delirium) during a one month period | ||
Delirium incidence on any on any day during a one-month post-intervention period | ||
Mortality during previous 6 months | ||
Hospital admissions during previous 6 months including total length of stay, number of admissions, time to first admission | ||
 | What are the rates of delirium and admission to hospital in residents in intervention homes compared to control homes post intervention? And which measure yields more complete hospital admission data: length of stay, number of admissions or time to admission? |  |
To estimate the rates of delirium and hospital admissions in intervention and control homes | What is the intraclass coefficient (ICC) for the proposed primary outcome, delirium occurrence? | The primary outcome for this study is the presence of delirium on any day during a one-month post intervention period determined by screening with short version CAM [26] on alternate days (except Sundays) and confirmed for those positive or borderline using the Delirium Rating Scale-98 (DRSR98) [27]. |