Skip to main content

Table 4 The reporting number and percentage for each item of STRICTA 2010 checklist of information

From: Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review

Items

Detail

24 acupuncture trials

  

Number of RCTs

Percent (%)

1. Acupuncture rationale

1a) Style of acupuncture

23

95.8

 

1b) Reasoning for treatment provided, based on historical context, literature sources, and/or consensus methods, with references where appropriate

19

79.2

 

1c) Extent to which treatment was varied

3

12.5

Total section (average)

15

62.5

2. Details of needling

2a) Number of needle insertions per subject per session (mean and range where relevant)

11

45.8

 

2b) Names (or location if no standard name) of points used (uni/bilateral)

23

95.8

 

2c) Depth of insertion, based on a specified unit of measurement, or on a particular tissue level

15

62.5

 

2d) Response sought

4

16.7

 

2e) Needle stimulation

15

62.5

 

2f) Needle retention time

19

79.2

 

2g) Needle type

21

87.5

Total section (average)

15.4

64.3

3. Treatment regimen

3a) Number of treatment sessions

13

54.2

 

3b) Frequency and duration of treatment sessions

19

79.2

Total section (average)

16

66.7

4. Other components of treatment

4a) Details of other interventions administered to the acupuncture group (for example, moxibustion, cupping, herbs, exercises, lifestyle advice)

17

70.8

 

4b) Setting and context of treatment, including instructions to practitioners, and information and explanations to patients

6

25.0

Total section (average)

11.5

47.9

5. Practitioner background

5) Description of participating acupuncturists (qualification or professional affiliation, years in acupuncture practice, other relevant experience)

14

58.3

Total section (average)

14

58.3

6. Control or comparator interventions

6a) Rationale for the control or comparator in the context of the research question, with sources that justify this choice

10

41.7

 

6b) Precise description of the control or comparator. If sham acupuncture or any other type of acupuncture-like control is used, provide details as for items 1 to 3 above.

23

95.8

Total section (average)

16.5

68.8

Total

10.6

62.5

  1. STRICTA: Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture.
  2. This checklist is designed to replace CONSORT 2010’s item 5 when reporting an acupuncture trial.
  3. Values are presented as number of reported RCTs divided by the total number of eligible RCTs.