Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
3 Jan 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Sullivan
2 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Graffy
14 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Peter Bower
Resubmission - Version 3
14 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Sullivan
1 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Graffy
15 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Peter Bower
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Sep 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Sullivan
17 Sep 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Graffy
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
30 Sep 2014 Editorially accepted
16 Oct 2014 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-15-399

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement