Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive Statistics of the scientific advice (SA)/protocol assistance (PA) procedures in the years 2007 to 2012

From: Adaptive clinical trial designs for European marketing authorization: a survey of scientific advice letters from the European Medicines Agency

Variable

 

N (%)

Number of SA/PA letters with questions on adaptive phase II, phase II/III or phase III designs

 

59 (100%)

Type of medicinal product

New chemical entity

23 (39%)

Known chemical entity

13 (22%)

New biological

13 (22%)

Known biological

6 (10%)

Advanced therapy

4 (7%)

Therapeutic area of the indication of the medicinal product

Infectious disorders

4 (7%)

Oncology

27 (46%)

Endocrine and metabolic disorders

3 (5%)

Neurologic and psychiatric disorders

3 (5%)

Cardiovascular

6 (10%)

Diagnostics

1 (2%)

Respiratory

3 (5%)

Dermatology

2 (3%)

Others

10 (17%)

Rare disease (prevalence of <5/10,000)

 

35 (59%)

Applied for orphan designation

 

21 (36%)

Small or medium enterprise

 

15 (25%)

Year when the SA/PA letter was issued

2007

7 (12%)

2008

11 (19%)

2009

8 (14%)

2010

10 (17%)

2011

16 (27%)

2012

7 (12%)

Scale of measurement of the primary endpoint discussed

Time to event

28 (47%)

Binary

20 (34%)

Continuous

11 (19%)

Adaptive study is the only pivotal trial

 

44 (75%)

Development phase for which the adaptive clinical trial is proposed

Phase II or IIb

4 (7%)

Phase II/III

16 (27%)

Phase III

38 (64%)

Pediatric study

1 (2%)

Number of arms of the adaptive trial discussed

1

2 (3%)

2

34 (58%)

3

15 (25%)

>3

8 (14%)

Stopping for futility was planned for in the adaptive trial

Yes

31 (53%)

Stopping for efficacy was planned for in the adaptive trial

Yes

19 (32%)

Number of interim analyses planned in the adaptive trial

1

43 (73%)

2

13 (22%)

>2

3 (5%)

Type of adaptations planned (multiple answers possible)

Sample size reassessment

43 (73%)

Population enrichment

5 (8%)

Dropping of treatment arms

19 (32%)

Other adaptations

4 (7%)

CHMP raised issues regarding type I error rate control

 

19 (32%)

Categorization of the CHMP advice regarding the adaptive study design

Accepted

15 (25%)

Accepted conditionally (concerns to be addressed)

32 (54%)

Not accepted

12 (20%)