Stage of patient pathway | Component of intervention | purpose | Structure and components | Theory/rationale | Flexibility to individual patient | Degree of active patient participation required | Healthcare professionals involved | Attributes and relevant training of healthcare professional | Location | Timing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage one – ICU discharge | Introduction of patient to GRA, initial assessment, and explanation of rehabilitation strategy | To establish relationship between GRA and patient | Initial meeting | Early commitment to provide individualised rehabilitation and information will promote engagement, trust and reassurance, and reduce perception of abandonment | Low | Low | GRAs together with existing rehabilitation teams (primarily physiotherapy and dietetics) | GRA competency-based training in assessment and awareness of common ICU problems | General ward; occasionally in the ICU prior to discharge | As soon as feasible following allocation to intervention group |
 |  | Provide information to patient and carer | Formal assessment of function |  | Timing to suit patient, but within 1 day of randomisation in most cases |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  | Setting initial rehabilitation goals |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 | Meeting between patient and ICU consultant, with involvement of GRA and family where appropriate | To provide information about ICU stay and likely problems during recovery | Scheduled meeting | Information will reduce stress and anxiety | Moderate | Moderate | ICU consultant. | ICU consultant familiar with topic guide, knowledge of generic post-ICU issues and the individual patient history | General ward | During the first week or when deemed most appropriate by the GRA |
 |  | Opportunity for patients and family to ask questions | Topic guided discussion to cover physical and psychological sequelae of critical illness1 | Filling in gaps and exploring delusional memories may reduce psychological morbidity | Optional; patient may decline meeting |  | Meeting usually attended by GRA |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  | Answering questions and providing realistic expectations may help adjustment | Meeting tailored to individual patient and family |  |  |  |  |  |
 | Provision of lay summary of ICU stay | Provide information about ICU stay and likely problems during recovery in understandable format | Lay summary dictated by consultant familiar with patient history using standard proforma2 | Information in summary will achieve similar outcomes to the consultant visit and/or consolidate information given | Moderate | Low | ICU consultant to generate summary | ICU consultant familiar with topic guide, knowledge of generic post-ICU issues and the individual patient history | General ward | During post-ICU hospital stay |
 |  |  |  | Written summary can be used as ongoing resource by patient and family | All patients provided with summary, but decision regarding how and when to read this and use it at patient discretion |  | GRA to provide it to the patient, often with additional explanation | GRA with relevant training to assist patient in understanding content if needed |  | Posted to patient post-discharge if not available prior to hospital discharge |
 |  |  |  | Important as poor memory and other cognitive impairments may limit retention of information from meeting |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 | Provision of self-help rehabilitation manual | Provide a resource to support recovery process | Manual that improved physical recovery in a previous randomised controlled trial3 | Supported use of the self-help manual improved physical function components of quality of life questionnaires when used during the first 2 months following ICU discharge | Moderate | High | GRA | GRA familiar with the content and goals of the manual | General ward | Early during the post-ICU stay |
 |  |  |  |  | Manual provided to all patients |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  | Use tailored to individual patients |  |  |  |  |  |
Stage two –Ward-based rehabilitation | Regular assessment by GRA | To assess patients using a combination of clinical judgement and standardised screening tools in relation to: | Frequent assessment and reassessment | A regular structured approach by a single individual to identify problems across multiple areas that potentially contribute to disability will improve coordination of care by senior rehabilitation staff who often working separately | Moderate | Moderate | GRA | GRA trained to defined competencies in each area | General ward | Throughout acute hospital stay |
 |  | Physical function. Nutritional status and dietary intake | Use of screening tools to trigger specialist advice from: physiotherapy, dietetics, occupational therapy, and speech and language therapy4 | Consistency across multiple relevant areas will reduce the chance of one unaddressed issue slowing overall recovery | Frequency and timing of formal assessments and use of screening tools at discretion of GRA, but expected to occur weekly | Screening and assessment largely undertaken by GRA |  | GRA trained in use of screening tools |  |  |
 |  | Activities of daily living |  |  | Informal assessment on more frequent basis |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  | Communication and swallowing |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 | Individualised goal setting | To set achievable realistic rehabilitation goals, individualised to each patient | Documented individualised goals agreed between rehabilitation team and patient | Individualised goal-setting is effective in other rehabilitation settings | High | High | GRAs and senior specialist rehabilitation staff as necessary | Training in the use of goal-setting in rehabilitation settings | General ward | Throughout acute hospital stay |
 |  |  | Regularly revised | Allows patient to focus on issues important to them | Intention to define achievable goals approximately weekly, but adjusted to individual patients |  |  |  | Potentially other settings (home visits; trips to other areas) |  |
 |  |  |  | Patient feels empowered and involved |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  | Achieving goals and documenting progress may have additional beneficial effects on psychological morbidity |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 | Therapy sessions | Provide therapy sessions designed to achieve rehabilitation goals | Individually tailored therapy in areas of: Physiotherapy | Physiotherapy will improve the prominent symptomatology, and restore abilities to undertake ADL | High | High | GRA | Competency-based training in all relevant areas | General ward | Throughout acute hospital stay |
 |  |  | Dietetics | Dietetic therapy will address weight loss and barriers to nutritional recovery, such as poor appetite |  | Discrepancy between intended therapy and treatment achieved by patient strongly influenced by patient fatigue, mood, delirium, and many other issues | Planning and advice from senior rehabilitation specialists |  | Physiotherapy department | Timing and frequency determined by GRA and rehabilitation teams. Target at least one session per day from GRA monday to friday |
 |  |  | Occupational therapy | Occupational therapy will restore ability to undertake ADLs, reduce disability, and improve independence |  |  | Variable amount of therapy provided by senior specialists according to individual need |  | Occupational therapy department |  |
 |  |  | Speech and language therapy | Speech and language therapy will treat specific swallowing problems or communication issues |  |  |  |  | Other hospital areas (stairs and mobility) |  |
 |  |  | Pre-defined sub-types of therapy to capture the processes that occurred in each session or patient encounter | Coordinated approach to therapy will reduce disability, improve quality of life, and may decrease psychological morbidity. |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 | Offer visit to the ICU | May help with memories and adjustment to health status | Accompanied visit to ICU with GRA, medical staff, and family according to patient preference | ICU visit may help fill in gaps for some patients | High | High | GRA plus other staff according to patient preference | GRA familiar with individual patient history, and trained in common psychological morbidity and memories of ICU | ICU in which patient was cared for | Any time during acute hospital stay, or after hospital discharge if preferred |
 |  |  |  | May help with adjustment to illness or dealing with dreams and delusional memories | ICU visit optional |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  | May reduce psychological issues | Timing to suit individual patient |  |  |  |  |  |
Stage three – Hospital discharge planning | Liaison with ward-based staff to ensure equipment and community referrals are in place before discharge home | Ensure services and equipment are in place during the transition from hospital to the community | Liaison between the GRA and other healthcare professionals to ensure services and equipment are in place at discharge | Ensure patient has correct services and equipment in place at home for discharge | Moderate | Moderate | GRA and other healthcare staff depending on patient needs | GRA familiar with patient history and social/home circumstance | General ward | Throughout ward stay to allow planning but in particular in the time leading up to discharge from hospital |
 |  |  |  | Ensuring patient is as supported at possible at the time of discharge from hospital |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Stage four – Post-hospital discharge | Provide contact details for GRA | A single point of contact to coordinate help if patient not coping in the community | Provide mobile phone number and advice to contact if required | Many patients are discharged home with significant disability | Moderate | Moderate | GRA | GRA familiar with individual patient case history | Community | Following hospital discharge at discretion of GRA |
 | Telephone patient at least once following discharge |  | A topic guide to ensure all issues are covered | Patients and families often uncertain where to turn for help | All patients and families will receive contact details |  |  | Trained to mobilise relevant hospital and community teams as required |  | Unsolicited contact within 1 week of discharge |
 |  |  | Ensure any equipment and community referrals are in place | Single point of contact to individual who knows their history well will enable rapid identification of problems and solutions | All patients will receive one unsolicited contact |  |  |  |  | Ongoing contact available until primary outcome measurement |
 |  |  |  | This will reduce patient/family stress, decrease chance of emergency readmission, and improve efficiency of use of community rehabilitation teams | Numbers of subsequent contacts determined by patient and family |  |  |  |  |  |
 | GP discharge summary (example proforma included in Additional file 1) | A discharge summary completed by the GRA to provide additional information to GPs about the impact of the critical illness on the patient | A summary of functional ability across physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics and speech and language therapy | GPs often only manage 1 to 2 patients a year that suffer a critical illness | High | Low | GRA | GRA familiar with the individual patient case history and status at the time of discharge | Office-based activity | Immediately following hospital discharge |
 |  |  | A short summary of psychological function | This information will increase their knowledge about the specific issues faced by the individual patient after a critical illness | All discharge summary letters will be completed with patient specific detail |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  | A summary of community referrals made | The additional general information about common sequelae after critical illness will increase the GPs general knowledge of the issues faced by patients after critical illness and facilitate the identification of any issues that arise after discharge and can be managed by the GP | All summaries will include standard information about the general sequelae after critical illness |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  | Information about typical physical and psychological sequelae after critical illness |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |