This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Using mixed methods to evaluate efficacy and user expectations of a virtual reality–based training system for upper-limb recovery in patients after stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
© Schuster-Amft et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 18 March 2014
Accepted: 18 August 2014
Published: 6 September 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Mar 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erik Cobo|
|27 Jul 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Corina Schuster-Amft|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jul 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Aug 2014||Editorially accepted|
|6 Sep 2014||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-15-350|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.