From: Meta-analysis of randomized phase II trials to inform subsequent phase III decisions
Issue | Recommendation |
---|---|
Framework | Use a logistic regression model to model the binomial distribution of the data within studies, and to avoid continuity corrections given a zero event in one arm. |
Choice of model | Do not make decisions to use a fixed-effect or random-effects model based on I2 or tests for heterogeneity. |
Heterogeneity | State a priori that a random-effects model will be used to account for heterogeneity in treatment effects. |
Uncertainty | Use a Bayesian framework to account for all parameter uncertainty and external evidence (such as the between-study variance) and to enable direct probabilistic inferences. However, a sensitivity analysis to the choice of prior distributions is required. |
Prediction intervals | Report 95% prediction intervals as they reveal the potential treatment effect in a new population, and inform subsequent Phase III decisions. |
Bias | Use skeptical prior distributions for the treatment effect if there is evidence to suggest the Phase II trials may be biased in favor of the treatment. |