Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Getting added value from using qualitative research with randomized controlled trials: a qualitative interview study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
1 Nov 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Lawton
4 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicola Mills
13 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharlene Hesse-biber
20 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Lawton
3 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicola Mills
3 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharlene Hesse-biber
28 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 May 2014 Editorially accepted
9 Jun 2014 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-15-215

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement