Getting added value from using qualitative research with randomized controlled trials: a qualitative interview study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Nov 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Lawton|
|4 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Mills|
|13 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sharlene Hesse-biber|
|20 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Lawton|
|3 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Mills|
|3 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sharlene Hesse-biber|
|28 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-15-215|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.