The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Jan 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nick Parsons|
|21 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Travis Loux|
|17 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Morris|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Travis Loux|
|27 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nick Parsons|
|3 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Morris|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|23 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-15-139|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.