Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Homeopathic drug proving of Okoubaka aubrevillei: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

  • Michael Teut1Email author,
  • Joern Dahler1,
  • Ute Hirschberg1,
  • Rainer Luedtke2,
  • Henning Albrecht2 and
  • Claudia M Witt1
Trials201314:96

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-96

Received: 12 September 2012

Accepted: 29 January 2013

Published: 5 April 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Lewith
4 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Riley
14 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Michael Teut
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Lewith
25 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Riley
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
29 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
5 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-14-96

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center
(2)
Karl and Veronica Carstens Foundation

Advertisement