First Meeting (25 February 2009): | |
∙ | Requested details of adverse event reporting and listings of all individual events by patient identification |
Second Meeting (18 June 2009): | |
∙ | Requested information on children screened for the trial but not enrolled |
∙ | Requested the number and quantity of additional fluids (other than boluses) given to all children |
∙ | Asked the study teams to make extra effort to ensure that all children attend for neurological examination at 28 days |
Third meeting (12 October 2009): | |
∙ | Endorsed the review procedure for SAE proposed, and stressed the importance of blinded review by the ERC |
∙ | Accepted co-enrollment of children into other studies |
∙ | Noted planned sub-studies |
Fourth meeting (26 January 2010, third interim analysis): | |
∙ | Observed improvement in attendance for neurological follow up at 28 days |
∙ | Referred the request by a local IRB for representation on the IDMC to the TSC |
∙ | Requested more detailed information on all fluids received in each arm by time from randomization |
∙ | Agreed with the proposed plan of analysis |