Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sylvia Dickson
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ursula Bowler
27 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bridget Young
28 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Usha Menon
28 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sylvia Dickson
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bridget Young
6 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ursula Bowler
16 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Usha Menon
20 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sylvia Dickson
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bridget Young
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
7 Nov 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Nov 2013 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-14-389

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement