Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “Spin” in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
11 Jun 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Boutron
25 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Satyanarayana Vedula
12 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jo Dumville
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Satyanarayana Vedula
26 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Boutron
9 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jo Dumville
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jo Dumville
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jo Dumville
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Oct 2013 Editorially accepted
6 Nov 2013 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-14-371

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement