Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A self-management program for employees with complaints of the arm, neck, or shoulder (CANS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
2 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
1 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kelli Allen
12 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nathan Hutting
Resubmission - Version 2
12 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nathan Hutting
Resubmission - Version 3
13 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith
26 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nathan Hutting
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nathan Hutting
19 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nathan Hutting
Resubmission - Version 6
30 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
1 Aug 2013 Editorially accepted
16 Aug 2013 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-14-258

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement