This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
© Duncan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 24 April 2013
Accepted: 5 July 2013
Published: 31 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Apr 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Amy Duncan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Damery|
|4 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Amy Duncan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-14-239|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.