Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Toby Lasserson|
|26 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Tovey|
|16 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jamie Kirkham|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Toby Lasserson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-14-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.