Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Ellard|
|3 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Louise Kinmonth|
|22 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aileen Grant|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Ellard|
|12 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith|
|13 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aileen Grant|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-14-15|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.