Skip to main content

Table 1 Recommendations for explicit reporting of information relating to adherence to treatment protocol

From: Nonadherence to treatment protocol in published randomised controlled trials: a review

 

Report for all trials

Report according to treatment duration

Report reasons for

justification

  

Single (one-off) intervention

Short-term intervention

Long-term intervention

  

1. Randomisation

Randomiseda

    

‘Crucial count for defining trial size and assessing whether a trial has been analysed by intention to treat’; necessary to determine whether all trial participants received treatment and were included in analysis.

2. Adherence to treatment protocol

     

a. Initiation

 

Initiated (or received) randomised interventiona

Initiated randomised interventiona

Initiated randomised interventiona

Those not initiating randomised intervention

‘Knowing the number of participants who did not receive the intervention as allocated or did not complete treatment permits the reader to assess to what extent the estimated efficacy of therapy might be underestimated in comparison with ideal circumstances.’

b. Completion/persistenceb

 

Completed randomised interventiona

Persisted with randomised intervention as required by treatment protocola

Those who did not complete/persist with randomised intervention

c. Adherence over treatment period c

     

i) Method

 

Description of method used to measure adherence over treatment period (and of an additional method to check reliability if trial involves participant-administered intervention)

 

If participant compliance data are collected, the reliability of the method used to record compliance should ideally be checked by use of another method (for example, treatment diaries backed up by counts of remaining tablets at the end of each course of treatment) [26]

ii) Justification for definition

 

Justification for any reported definition of adherence (for example, if a threshold is used to define adequate adherence)d

 

‘If patients are to be divided into “compliant” and “noncompliant” groups, the division should ideally be made on the grounds of the relationship of the compliance level to the therapeutic response or outcome’ [29]

iii) Results

 

Measure of participant and/or treatment provider adherence with randomised intervention (as appropriate)d

Any participant or treatment provider nonadherenced

 

3. Analysis

      

a. Analysed

Analyseda

   

Any exclusion of participants from analysis

‘Attrition as a result of loss to follow up, which is often unavoidable, needs to be distinguished from investigator-determined exclusion for such reasons as ineligibility, withdrawal from treatment, and poor adherence to the trial protocol…Participants who were excluded after allocation are unlikely to be representative of all participants in the study.’

b. Analysis set composition

How analysis sets differ from randomised groups

   

Any difference between analysis sets and randomisation groups

‘Erroneous conclusions can be reached if participants are excluded from analysis, and imbalances in such omissions between groups may be especially indicative of bias.’

  1. Quoted justification is taken from CONSORT 2010 elaboration document [13] unless stated otherwise. aReport numbers of participants in each randomised intervention group satisfying condition listed in each cell. bPersistence is defined as perseverance with prescribed treatment until the end of the treatment period. cAdherence is defined as a measure of the degree of correspondence between prescribed treatment and actual treatment received by participant. dNote that, depending on the complexity of treatment, it may not be necessary for trials with a short-term intervention to report on adherence over the treatment period.