Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Lack of proportionality. Seven specifications of public interest that override post-approval commercial interests on limited access to clinical data

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
9 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anders W Jørgensen
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elina Hemminki
9 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Strech
Resubmission - Version 5
9 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anders W Jørgensen
29 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elina Hemminki
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
2 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
2 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-13-100

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement