Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Investigator experiences with financial conflicts of interest in clinical trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
1 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Gluud
10 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Raftery
7 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Paula A. Rochon
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Raftery
28 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Gluud
25 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Paula A. Rochon
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
12 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
12 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-12-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement