Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 24 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
| 8 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Olaf Bakker |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
| 22 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Olaf Bakker |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 22 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 7 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
| 11 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Olaf Bakker |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 11 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 24 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Olaf Bakker |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 24 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| 2 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Olaf Bakker |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 2 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-73 |
You can find further information about peer review here.