Skip to main content

Table 3 Association Between Funding and Authors' Conflicts of Interest for the Included Randomised Controlled Trials and the Type of Intention-to-treat Reporting.

From: Modified versus standard intention-to-treat reporting: Are there differences in methodological quality, sponsorship, and findings in randomized trials? A cross-sectional study

Type of Intention-to-treat

Funding

Authors' Conflicts of Interest

 

Not for-profit organization

For-Profit Agency

Co-financed

Not Reported

Author declaring no competing interests

Author on behalf of a for-profit agency

Author disclosing other financial ties

No report of competing interests

 

Unadjusted Odds Ratio (Confidence Interval 95%)

mITT

1

7.99

(3.59 to 17.82)

1.16

(0.37 to 3.69)

1.09

(0.22 to 5.46)

1

5.29

(2.31 to 12.08)

0.66

(0.16 to 2.63)

4.20

(1.16 to 15.19)

"no ITT"

1

1.44

0.99

2.81

1

1.12

0.91

7.38

  

(0.80 to 2.57)

(0.52 to 1.92)

(1.37 to 5.78)

 

(0.62 to 2.03)

(0.45 to 1.85)

(3.32 to 16.40)

 

Adjusted Odds Ratio (Confidence Interval 95%)

mITT

1

7.41

(3.14 to 17.48)

1.08

(0.32 to 3.58)

0.87

(0.16 to 4.71)

1

5.14

(2.12 to 12.48)

0.62

(0.15 to 2.61)

4.78

(1.03 to 22.08)

"no ITT"

1

1.23

(0.62 to 2.43)

0.82

(0.39 to 1.72)

1.31

(0.54 to 3.15)

1

0.88

(0.45 to 1.73)

0.60

(0.26 to 1.38)

3.77

(1.30 to 10.94)

  1. ITT is the comparison group.
  2. mITT = modified intention-to-treat
  3. ITT = intention-to-treat.