Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
20 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Khattab
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence Friedman
15 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Khattab
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Khattab
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ahmed Khattab
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
28 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-12-56

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement