Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Sample size requirements for separating out the effects of combination treatments: Randomised controlled trials of combination therapy vs. standard treatment compared to factorial designs for patients with tuberculous meningitis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
29 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Marcel Wolbers
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aeilko Having Zwinderman
23 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Couper
10 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Marcel Wolbers
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Marcel Wolbers
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Marcel Wolbers
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
2 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-12-26

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement