Open Peer Review Reports for: Failure to report protocol violations in clinical trials: a threat to internal validity?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sean Bagshaw |
| 7 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christian Gluud |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gordon Doig |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gordon Doig |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christian Gluud |
| 19 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gordon Doig |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gordon Doig |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 26 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-214 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
