Skip to main content

Table 7 Direction of effects Quality of Life

From: A meta-review of evidence on heart failure disease management programs: the challenges of describing and synthesizing evidence on complex interventions

Review

Measures

Pooling (Y/N)

Result of pooling

Phillips et al. (2005) [31]

NHP

MLHF

HFSBS

Y

(5/6 studies reported QOL)

+

Intervention: 30.6 ± 20.7% VS. control: 19.3 ± 12.6%, p = 0.13

Gwadry-Sridhar et al. (2004) [33]

SF-36

N

(4/8 studies reported HRQOL; precluded pooling)

RNPH

Koshman et al. (2008) [35]

MLHF

COOP/WONCA

SF-36

EQ-5D

CHFQ

N

(7/12 studies reported HRQOL; precluded pooling)

RNPH

Roccaforte et al. (2005) [28]

MLHF

SF-36

N

(16/33 studies reported QOL; varying presentation of results precluded pooling)

RNPH

Taylor et al. (2005) [27]

MLHF

QLHFQ

CHFQ

Time trade off method (?)

N

(8/16 studies reported HRQOL; varying results)

RNPH

Phillips et al. (2004) [29]

MLHF

NHP

HFSBS

SF-36

Y

(5/18 studies reported HRQOL)

+

Intervention: 25.7% [95% CI, 11.0%-40.4%] VS. control: 13.5% [95% CI, 5.1%-22.0%]

McAlister et al. (2001) [26]

NR

N (5/11 studies reported HRQOL)

Insufficient data

  1. HRQOL = Health-related quality of life; QOL = Quality of life
  2. MLHF = Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; COOP/WONCA = Dartmouth Primary Care Cooperative Research Network/World Organization of National Colleges, Academics and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians; SF-36 = 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; EQ-5D = EuroQol-5 Dimensions form
  3. NHP = Nottingham Health Profile; HFSBS = Heart Failure Self Care Behaviour Scale; QLHFQ = Quality of Life in Heart Failure Questionnaire; CHFQ = Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire
  4. RNPH: Results not pooled due to heterogeneity
  5. + = Non-significant trend favoring intervention
  6. ++ = Significant trend favoring intervention