Skip to main content

Table 2 Meta-analyses included in review

From: A meta-review of evidence on heart failure disease management programs: the challenges of describing and synthesizing evidence on complex interventions

Review (Reference number)

Number of trials

N of total sample

Sex

(% males)

Mean Age

SD Age

Age Range (Years)

AMSTAR

Score

Koshman et al. [35]

12

2060

NR

NR

NR

58-80

7

Clark et al. [25]

14

4264

NR

NR

NR

57-75

8

Gohler et al. [32]

36

8341

37-99%

NR

NR

56-79

5

Jovicic et al. [24]

6

857

53-76%

NR

NR

56-76

7

Holland et al. [34]

30

NR

27-99%

NR

NR

56-80

4

Kim & Soeken [23]

4

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR to 64.0 to 81.6

6

Phillips et al. [31]

6

949

58%

73

NR

62-79

8

Roccaforte et al. [28]

33

3817

42%

73

NR

NR

8

Taylor et al. [27]

16

1627

23-86%

NR

NR

70-80

9

Whellan et al. [36]

19

5752

NR

NR

NR

56-80

2

Gonseth et al. [37]

54: 27 randomized and 27 non-randomized

3160

NR

Over 70 in most trials

NR

Not summarized

9

Gwadry-Sridhar et al. [33]

8

1239

37-58%

NR

NR

71 -80.3

6

McAlister et al. [30]

29

5039

NR

NR

NR

56-80

5

Phillips et al. [29]

18

3304

62%

NR

NR

NR

7

McAlister et al. [26]

11

2067

NR

NR

NR

63-80

5