Skip to main content

Table 1 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

From: Effect of spinal manipulation on sensorimotor functions in back pain patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Inclusion criteria

Rationale

Source

Age 21 y -65 y inclusive

Individuals > 65 are not as likely to tolerate the biomechanical tests and experience altered sensorimotor function. Children not considered for study

PS, BL1 Int

Acute, sub-acute or chronic LBP matching QTF classifications 1, 2, 3 or 7

Low back pain, uncomplicated by known nerve compression, neurological signs or prior surgery

Exam, CR

Numerical Pain Rating Scale of > 4 at PS or BL1 &≥2 at PS, BL1, BL2

Low back pain with enough severity to demonstrate clinical improvement

PS, HA1, HA2

Signed the Informed Consent Documents

Research policy

PS, BL1 Int, BL2 Int

Exclusion criteria

Rationale

Source

Bleeding disorders

Safety concern for biomechanical testing procedures

Exam, CR

Sensitivity to tape used during the sensorimotor function tests

Safety concern for biomechanical testing procedures

BL1 Int, Exam

Pregnancy or nursing

Safety concern for biomechanical testing procedures

PS, BL1 Int, BL2 Int

Contra-indication to SM

Safety concern for treatment protocols

Exam, CR

Joint Replacement

Safety not confirmed for biomechanical testing

PS, BL1 Int, Exam, BL2 Int

Pacemaker

Safety not confirmed when used near biomechanical equipment producing electromagnetic field

PS, BL1 Int, Exam, BL2 Int

Extreme obesity (≥ 307 lbs)

Safety concern related to equipment weight capacity

BL1 Int

Vascular claudication

Condition can result in intolerance to biomechanical testing protocols

PS, Exam, CR

Bone and joint abnormality

Condition can result in intolerance to biomechanical testing or treatment protocols

PS, Exam, CR

Inflammatory or Destructive tissue changes to the spine

Condition can result in intolerance to biomechanical testing or treatment protocols

Exam, CR

Osteoporosis

Condition can result in intolerance to biomechanical testing or treatment protocols

PS, Exam, CR

General poor health

Overall condition is too poor to tolerate both treatment and biomechanical testing procedures

Exam, CR

Neuromuscular Diseases

Condition might interfere with data collection

PS, Exam, CR

Peripheral Neuropathies

Condition might interfere with data collection

PS, Exam, CR

Spinal Surgery

Condition might interfere with data collection

PS, Exam, CR

Suspicion of drug or alcohol abuse

Condition can interfere with ability to comply with study protocol and data collection

BL1 Int, Exam, CR

Uncontrolled hypertension

Condition might make it difficult to receive treatment or perform research procedures

PS, BL1 Int, Exam

BDI-II ≥ 29

Condition can interfere with ability to comply with study protocol and data collection

HA1

QTF 4-6 & 8-11

Condition of sufficient complicated nature to cause intolerance to biomechanical testing procedures or data collection

Exam, CR

Cauda Equina Syndrome

Requires emergency surgical evaluation

Exam, CR

Inability to read or verbally comprehend English

Difficult to ensure full consent

PS, BL1 Int

Further diagnostic procedures other than dipstick urinalysis or x-rays

Advanced diagnostic testing was unavailable

Exam, CR

Retention of legal advice and open or pending case related to LBP

May interfere with study compliance

PS, BL1 Int, BL2 Int

Ongoing treatment for LBP by other health care providers

Possible confounding data

PS, BL1 Int, BL2 Int

  1. BDI-II- Beck Depression Inventory; BL1- Baseline Visit 1; BL2- Baseline Visit 2; CR- Case Review; Exam- Determined by the examining clinician; HA1- Health Assessment Questionnaire administered at BL1; HA2- Health Assessment Questionnaire administered at BL2; Int- Study Coordinator administered Interview; PS- Phone CATI Screen; QTF- Quebec Task Force; SM- Spinal Manipulation