Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Through the looking glass: understanding non-inferiority

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
25 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Janet Wittes
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Rothmann
26 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Marson
4 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Janet Wittes
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Marson
13 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Rothmann
21 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Janet Wittes
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Janet Wittes
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
27 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Janet Wittes
Resubmission - Version 8
27 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
3 May 2011 Editorially accepted
3 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-12-106

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement