Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
30 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith
9 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa Schwartz
11 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Howard Mann
16 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marko Simunovic
7 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Charles Weijer
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Howard Mann
2 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marko Simunovic
6 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Charles Weijer
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Charles Weijer
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Charles Weijer
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Apr 2011 Editorially accepted
20 Apr 2011 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-12-100

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement