Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

LOST to follow-up Information in Trials (LOST-IT): a protocol on the potential impact

  • Elie A Akl1,
  • Matthias Briel2, 3,
  • John J You2, 4,
  • Francois Lamontagne2, 5,
  • Azim Gangji4,
  • Tali Cukierman-Yaffe6,
  • Mohamad Alshurafa2,
  • Xin Sun2, 7,
  • Kara A Nerenberg4,
  • Bradley C Johnston8,
  • Claudio Vera9,
  • Edward J Mills10,
  • Dirk Bassler11,
  • Arturo Salazar12,
  • Neera Bhatnagar13,
  • Jason W Busse2, 14,
  • Zara Khalid2,
  • SD Walter2,
  • Deborah J Cook2, 4,
  • Holger J Schünemann2, 15,
  • Douglas G Altman16 and
  • Gordon H Guyatt2, 4Email author
Trials200910:40

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-40

Received: 03 March 2009

Accepted: 11 June 2009

Published: 11 June 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Mar 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
18 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers
2 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gordon Guyatt
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gordon Guyatt
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gordon Guyatt
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
11 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
11 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-10-40

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Medicine and Family Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA
(2)
Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
(3)
Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
(4)
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
(5)
Department of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
(6)
Gertner Institute for Epidemiology & Health Policy Research, Sheba medical center, Sackler school of Medicine, Tel -Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
(7)
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R. China
(8)
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
(9)
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
(10)
Centre for International Health and Human Rights Studies, North York, Canada
(11)
Department of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
(12)
Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
(13)
Health Sciences Library, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
(14)
The Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Canada
(15)
Department of Epidemiology, Italian National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
(16)
Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Advertisement