Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: LOST to follow-up Information in Trials (LOST-IT): a protocol on the potential impact

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting editorial@trialsjournal.com.

Original Submission
3 Mar 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
18 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers
2 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gordon Guyatt
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gordon Guyatt
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gordon Guyatt
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
11 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
11 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-10-40

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement