Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of six studies reviewing subgroup analyses in randomized trials

From: Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized trials

Study ID

Trial area

Source of study

Number of trials

Trial feature for eligibility criteria

Wang (2007)

Multiple

NEJM (July 2005 to June 2006)

97 (59 reporting subgroup analyses)

No restrictions

Bhandari (2006)

Surgical

Two surgical journals plus NEJM, JAMA, BMJ, and Lancet (Jan 2000 to Apr 2003)

72 (27 reporting subgroup analyses)

No restriction on size and other trial characteristics

Hernandez (2006)

Cardiovascular

Four cardiovascular journals plus "Top Five" (2002 and 2004)

63 (39 reporting subgroup analyses)

Phase 3 parallel trials, n ≥ 100, superiority trials; restricted to main reports

Hernandez (2005)

Traumatic brain

MEDLINE (1966 to Apr 2004), EMBASE (1978 to Apr 2004), CENTRAL (Apr 2004)

18 (11 reporting subgroup analyses)

Phase 3, parallel trials, n ≥ 50 per arm

Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months as outcome

Moreira Jr (2001)

Multiple

NEJM, JAMA, Lancet, American Journal of Public Health (July 1998)

32 (17 reporting subgroup analyses)

No restrictions mentioned.

Assmann (2000)

Multiple

NEJM, JAMA, BMJ, and Lancet (July to Sep 1997)

50 (35 reporting subgroup analyses)

No crossover and cluster trials, n ≥ 50