Peer Review reports
From: Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Oct 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Jan 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bethan Copsey |
4 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Catherine Ouellet-Courtois |
27 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Rafael Dal-Re |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Mar 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bethan Copsey |
8 Mar 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Catherine Ouellet-Courtois |
11 Mar 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Rafael Dal-Re |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Mar 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Publishing | ||
13 Mar 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Mar 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s13063-017-1899-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.