Skip to main content

Table 4 Variability in intervention-related process indicators among collaborating centers allocated to the intervention group

From: Type-2 diabetes primary prevention program implemented in routine primary care: a process evaluation study

PHC center

Intervention reacha

Educational sessions completed

Intervention format (% group, individual, mixed)

Reception of ≥5 remote support contacts

SV

54,7 %

96.1 %

98.7 %, 1.3 %, 0 %

94.8 %

GK

44,7 %

80.9 %

100 %, 0 %, 0 %

79.8 %

BL

36,8 %

82.5 %

89.7 %, 7.7 %, 2.6 %

77.5 %

LG

44,4 %

92.2 %

62.7 %, 37.3 %, 0 %

92.2 %

DB

56,8 %

64.8 %

90.7 %, 5.6 %, 3.7 %

81.5 %

IZ

52,8 %

66.7 %

100 %, 0 %, 0 %

86.2 %

AR

35,6 %

75.9 %

75 %, 1 %, 17.9 %

86.2 %

Total

47,9 %

78.8 %

92.1 %, 6.2 %, 1 .8 %

85.8 %

  1. aCalculated as the proportion of patients included in the intervention from those detected as being at high risk of T2D after removing the proportion of diagnosed unknown T2D patients in each of the centers