Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of 15 harms criteria (CONSORT-harms extension used as a benchmark)

From: Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials

  

Trial ID

Criteria

Description of item

NM16189

M37013

M37002

M37047

BM15421

Methods criteria

1

List addressed adverse events (AEs) with definitions.

CSR

CSR

CSR

CSR

CSR

2

Mode of collecting harms data.

BOTH b

BOTH b

BOTH b

CSR

BOTH a

3

Timing and time frame of surveillance for adverse events.

BOTH b

Pub

CSR

NR

BOTH a

4

Attribution methods.

CSR

NR

CSR

NR

NR

5

Intensity of ascertainment.

CSR

BOTH b

CSR

CSR

CSR

6

Harms related monitoring.

CSR

BOTH b

CSR

CSR

CSR

7

Coding of AEs.

CSR

CSR

BOTH a

CSR

CSR

8

Handling of recurrent events.

NR

CSR

NR

CSR

NR

9

Timing issues.

CSR

CSR

CSR

NR

CSR

10

Plans to perform any statistical analyses and inferences.

CSR

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

Total items satisfied for methods criteria in clinical study report (CSR) (% of total 10 items assessed)

9 (90)

8 (80)

9 (90)

7 (70)

8 (80)

Total items satisfied for methods criteria in publication (% of total ten items assessed)

2 (20)

5 (50)

3 (30)

1 (10)

3 (30)

Results criteria

11

Withdrawals and discontinuations.

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

CSR

12

Denominators for analyses on harms.

BOTH b

BOTH b

BOTH a

CSR

BOTH b

13

Specifying AE type.

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

14

Grading or scaling used.

NR

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

15

Seriousness per arm.

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

BOTH a

Total items satisfied for results criteria in the CSR (% of total five items assessed)

4 (80)

5 (100)

5 (100)

5 (100)

5 (100)

Total items satisfied for results criteria in the publication (% of total five items assessed)

4 (80)

5 (100)

5 (100)

4 (80)

4 (80)

Total items satisfied in CSR (% of total 15 items assessed)

13 (87)

13 (87)

14 (93)

12 (80)

13 (87)

Total items satisfied in publication (% of total 15 items assessed)

6 (40)

10 (67)

8 (53)

5 (33)

7 (47)

  1. Footnote:
  2. BOTH ‘reported in CSR and the corresponding journal publication’, CSR ‘only reported within the CSR’, Pub ‘only reported in journal publication’, NR ‘neither reported in the CSR or journals publication’. Completeness of data where agreement (BOTH) is made coded as: a ‘More complete in CSR’; b ‘Similar quality for both documents’; - ‘less complete in the CSR’