Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of meta-analysis results for the individual MedDRA preferred term adverse events pooled across all five trials

From: Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials

Adverse events (AEs)

 

Breakdown of adverse events reporting

Meta-analysis characteristic

Total

Once in the clinical study report (CSR) and journal publication

CSR

Journal publication

Number of AE terms reported (% of total)

61

30 (49 %)

31 (51 %)

0 (0)

Direction of pooled risk effect in meta-analysis

 

For all 30 AEs there is agreement in direction of the pooled risk effect between the pairing of documents

• 23 (74 %) showed an increased pooled risk of AE on orlistat

• four (13 %) showed no difference

• four (13 %) showed increased pooled risk of AE on placebo

 

AE listings for when there is a change in effect including statistical significance

 

• Pooled risk effect was greater in journal publication for four AEs; increased defecation, oily spotting, oily evacuation, faecal incontinence

• Pooled risk effect was greater in the CSR for two AEs; soft stools, faecal urgency

• two (6 %) of the 23 AEs were statistically significant; faeces discolouration, dry skin a

• one (3 %) of the four AEs with increased risk on placebo was statistically significant; haemorrhoids a

 
  1. Footnote:
  2. aThese adverse events were mild and unrelated to treatment