From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials
© Berendt et al. 2016
Received: 28 September 2015
Accepted: 20 January 2016
Published: 19 February 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rakesh Aggarwal|
|4 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vance Berger|
|18 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lynda Constable|
|19 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Boyle|
|11 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Louise Berendt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Jan 2016||Editorially accepted|
|19 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s13063-016-1189-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.