First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis versus proximal phalanx hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus: feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
© Divecha et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 17 October 2013
Accepted: 25 February 2014
Published: 13 March 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Oct 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Harris|
|8 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kent Johnson|
|3 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Hiren Divecha|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Hiren Divecha|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|24 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|13 Mar 2014||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-15-79|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.