Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences
© Mills et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 11 March 2014
Accepted: 24 July 2014
Published: 13 August 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Mar 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Bower|
|29 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joy Adamson|
|7 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Lawton|
|30 Jun 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Nicola Mills|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Jun 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Jul 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Bower|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|24 Jul 2014||Editorially accepted|
|13 Aug 2014||Article published||10.1186/1745-6215-15-323|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.